BLOG · NOVEMBER 8, 2026 · CHRISTOPHER HORNE · CHECKED NOVEMBER 8, 2026 ·

How long can you play under the NCAA's new eligibility rule?

Five academic years. The clock starts your first full-time term or the fall after you turn 19, whichever comes first. A school's own deal with you can't run longer than that.

Short version: In Divisions I and II, you get five academic years. The clock starts with your first full-time term in college or the start of the academic year right after your 19th birthday, whichever comes first. A school's own deal with you can't run longer than that.

Until this year, the rule was four seasons of competition within five years. On June 23, 2026, the Division I Cabinet unanimously approved a replacement. Seasons stopped counting. The calendar counts instead.

The NCAA's name for it is the age-based eligibility model. Here's what the rule says, read in the Division I Manual on November 8, 2026, and what the courts have done with it since.

What the rule says

It's Bylaw 12.6. Your "period of eligibility for practice and competition shall be limited to five academic years." It begins with the earlier of two things.

The first is the regular term, a semester or quarter, when you enroll full time at any college and attend a class. That includes a college outside the US and a two-year college. The second is "the beginning of the regular academic year immediately after the individual's 19th birthday."

If you turn 19 on or after September 1 but before January 1, the clock waits for the fall term that begins the next calendar year, unless you enroll full time first. Start full time in January, and the count begins with that spring term.

Once it starts, it doesn't stop. The NCAA's Eligibility Center says the period doesn't pause because you don't compete, transfer, sit out, change teams or take time away. That's why redshirts are gone. A year on the bench counts as one of the five.

Waivers are gone too. Bylaw 12.6.10 says, in full, "There shall be no waivers of the application of the five-year period of eligibility legislation." One sentence, and five kinds of waivers the NCAA used to grant, medical hardship among them, are off the books. The NCAA lists three exceptions: pregnancy, active-duty military service and an official religious mission. Compete in organized games during the service, and the service exception doesn't apply.

The old rule counted the games you played. The new one counts the years since you started college, or since the fall after you turned 19.

Who it covers

The rule took effect August 1, 2026, but not everyone moved to it at once. This is the NCAA's own table, in plain words.

If youThe rules that apply
Used your last season under the old rules in 2025-26No additional eligibility
Had eligibility left after 2025-26The old rules or the new one, whichever is better for you
First enroll full time during 2026-27The old rules or the new one, whichever is better for you
First enroll full time in fall 2027 or laterThe new rule only

So a high school senior who starts college in fall 2027 lands in the last row. A current college athlete with seasons left gets whichever result is better, and the school does that review.

Josh Whitman, Illinois's athletics director and the Cabinet's chair, said that for many athletes who start college right after high school, the change means "the opportunity to potentially compete for an additional season in their chosen sport."

Division II's Executive Board adopted the same model as emergency legislation, announced August 5, effective for 2026-27. Division III hasn't. On October 28, the NCAA reported that Division III's Presidents Council took no position on a proposal for the January 2027 Convention and signaled sending it back for more study.

The window for deals

Here's where the clock touches the money. Bylaw 22.1.1 lets a school, or an entity it owns, controls, funds or operates, sign a license or endorsement deal with you "for a period not to exceed the student-athlete's period of eligibility." Bylaw 16.13.1.1, the rule for the payments schools have been allowed to make since July 1, 2025, says the same about any licensing, brand promotion or endorsement agreement.

There's one carve-out. If you agree to let the school use your name and likeness in content made while you're enrolled, the school can keep using that content after your eligibility runs out. The deal itself still ends with the period.

Those school payments come with two more conditions in Bylaw 16.13.1.1. You have to be enrolled full time, and you have to meet progress-toward-degree rules, which means staying on pace to graduate.

Deals with brands are a different bylaw. Bylaw 22.1.2 says you "may permit the use" of your name, image and likeness and be paid for it. In Division I, deals worth $600 or more still get reported to the clearinghouse, with deals from the same payer added up "during the student-athlete's period of eligibility." How long a brand deal runs is in the contract you sign.

So the five academic years are the longest a school's deal with you can run. The NCAA says delaying college past age 19 "may reduce the amount of eligibility available." The clock for a school's deal is that same clock.

What two courts did on July 31

Not everyone got the new math. Athletes who finished four seasons in 2025-26 were out under the old rule, and the NCAA didn't apply the new one to them. Two courts stepped in on the same Friday.

In Colorado, U.S. District Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney granted a preliminary injunction, a court order that holds things in place while a case goes on, in Wisne v. NCAA. It covered a nationwide class: Division I athletes who began playing in 2022-23 and had used four years of eligibility by the end of 2025-26.

Her order noted what the plaintiffs said the rule cost them, including "compensation from name, image, and likeness (NIL) agreements." Two days later, she clarified it. The NCAA was barred from stopping class members from playing a fifth season. Her order "does not enjoin the operation of transfer rules." It also didn't stop schools from deciding eligibility based on whether an athlete was over 20 when they enrolled in 2022-23.

The same day in Nashville, Davidson County Chancellor I'Ashea Myles granted a temporary injunction to Jalen Washington and 18 other basketball players. The Associated Press reported she ordered the NCAA to treat them as eligible for 2026-27 and not to stand in the way of their transfers.

Neither order held for long. On August 21, the Tenth Circuit stayed the Colorado injunction, 2-1, while the NCAA appealed. The NCAA's chief legal officer, Scott Bearby, told schools, "Effective immediately, the age-based eligibility rules will be implemented as the Division I membership intended."

By August 26, the Tennessee Court of Appeals had stayed the Nashville order too, On3 reported. The Tenth Circuit's stay covered only the Colorado case, so separate state court orders for other athletes were left where they stood. The appeals court heard argument in Wisne on October 13.

What the appeals court decided on November 6

On November 6, the Tenth Circuit reversed Judge Sweeney's order and vacated the injunction. Judge Carolyn McHugh wrote the opinion for a three-judge panel.

The case turned on the market. The players sued under the Sherman Act, the federal antitrust law, and said the market the rule restrains is all of Division I athletics in the United States. The court said that market "lacks evidentiary support." Its example: "a football player looking for a Division I roster spot would not view the 101 schools without a football program as reasonably good substitutes."

So the district court "clearly erred at the first step of the rule-of-reason analysis," which is defining the market, the opinion says. The order that certified the class wasn't before the appeals court.

The ruling is in the Colorado case. The Associated Press reported that it "doesn't resolve some 200 state cases that involve as many as 850 athletes."

What changed this fall

On September 9, the Division I Cabinet adopted Proposal No. M-2026-1, a set of wording fixes to the June rule. It spelled out that the five years are five academic years and set the September 1 to January 1 birthday timing above.

It also added a rule for when the last term is a fall term. Your period then runs through the day before classes start the next term. If an NCAA championship or a bowl period starts while you're still inside it, it stretches through your team's last game there.

On October 16, the NCAA sued Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine in federal court. The Associated Press reported the target was an executive order, signed three days earlier, giving Ohio's state universities the option of letting athletes from the high school class of 2022 play a fifth year.

Before college, your state's high school rules on deals apply, and they're on our high school map. In college, the state law around your deals depends on where your school is, on the college map. The clock follows you if you transfer. Every source for this post is linked at the bottom.

What Leave does with this

Upload a contract and Leave reads it back in plain words, including how long it runs and how it ends, and reminds you of its dates.

Leave takes 0 percent of anything you sign. You decide what to sign.

Questions people ask

Do redshirt years still exist?

Not in Divisions I and II. The NCAA says the age-based rules eliminate athletics redshirt rules and the counting of seasons. Once the five-year period starts, it runs continuously, and it doesn't pause when you sit out, transfer or change teams.

Does taking college classes in high school start the clock?

Usually not. Under Bylaw 12.6.6, a joint high school and college program doesn't start the period, as long as you haven't graduated from high school and don't compete for the college while you're in it.

Can a school's deal with me run after my eligibility ends?

Not past your period of eligibility. Bylaw 22.1.1 limits a school's license or endorsement agreement to a period that doesn't exceed it. Content the school made with you while you were enrolled can keep being used afterward if your agreement says so.

I played my fourth season in 2025-26. Do I get a fifth?

Under the NCAA's rule, no. Athletes who used their final season under the previous rules in 2025-26 get no additional eligibility. A federal class-wide order said otherwise on July 31, 2026. An appeals court stayed it on August 21 and reversed it on November 6. Some athletes sued on their own in state courts, with their own results.

Be your own agent. Leave.

SOURCES · CHECKED NOVEMBER 8, 2026
2026-27 NCAA Division I Manual, Bylaws 12.6, 16.13.1.1, 22.1.1, 22.1.2 and 22.2.2 (LSDBi report, generated November 4, 2026); Report of the NCAA Division I Cabinet, June 23-24, 2026, Proposal No. 2026-44 (PDF); Report of the NCAA Division I Cabinet, September 9, 2026, Proposal No. M-2026-1 (PDF); Wisne v. NCAA, No. 1:26-cv-03063 (D. Colo.), order granting a preliminary injunction, July 31, 2026, ECF No. 38 (PDF); Wisne v. NCAA, order clarifying the preliminary injunction, August 2, 2026, ECF No. 41 (PDF); Wisne v. NCAA, No. 26-1309 (10th Cir.), oral argument, October 13, 2026; Wisne v. NCAA, No. 26-1309 (10th Cir.), opinion reversing the preliminary injunction, November 6, 2026 (PDF); NCAA, Division I adopts age-based eligibility model (Meghan Durham Wright, 2026-06-23); NCAA, Division II adopts age-based eligibility model (Asha Evans, 2026-08-05); NCAA Eligibility Center, Division I and II age-based eligibility rules, Eligibility 101; NCAA, Division III Presidents Council takes no position on the age-based eligibility proposal (Olivia Brown, 2026-10-28); NCAA, President Charlie Baker announces legal filing in Ohio federal court (2026-10-16); Associated Press via ESPN, In temporary injunction, 19 players granted 5th season (2026-07-31); ESPN, Court halts order, denies extra year of eligibility (Dan Murphy, 2026-08-21); Associated Press via ESPN, NCAA secures win in struggle over five-year eligibility rule (2026-11-06); Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, Tenth Circuit stays nationwide eligibility injunction for Class of 2022 in Wisne v. NCAA (2026-09-04); On3, NCAA granted motion to stay injunction in Tennessee eligibility lawsuit (Brian Jones, 2026-08-26); Associated Press via News4JAX, NCAA says it has sued Ohio governor over his executive order (2026-10-16).
Written by Christopher Horne, who builds Leave. Leave is software, not an agent: it doesn't negotiate, represent anyone or arrange deals. It puts public information in one place and explains the terms in plain words. None of this is legal, tax or financial advice. Rules change, and the sources above carry the current text.