Short version: On October 28, 2026, the Big Ten capped how much each of its 18 schools can be involved in arranging outside deals for athletes, at $27.5 million a school. Add what a school can pay its athletes directly, and the conference puts the total at $49 million. Deals an athlete finds on their own aren't counted.
The headlines called it a $49 million cap. That number is two different kinds of money added together, and the new rule only touches one of them.
Two kinds of money
The first kind comes straight from the school. That's revenue sharing, under the House settlement, the deal that settled the case House v. NCAA. The College Sports Commission, which enforces the settlement's rules, says each school can share up to $21.58 million with its athletes in 2026-27. In 2025-26, the first year, it was $20.5 million.
The second kind is an outside deal, what the rules call a third-party deal. It's a deal with a business or person the school doesn't own or control. That money doesn't come from the school, and the commission says those payments "won't count toward the revenue sharing cap."
The Big Ten's new rule is about the second kind. More exactly, it's about the outside deals a school has a hand in arranging.
What the rule says
The conference's chancellors and presidents approved it on October 28, and it took effect right away. It "limits institutional involvement in arranging third-party NIL agreements" to $27.5 million per school. Institutional means the school.
The Big Ten then adds that to what the House settlement already lets a school pay, for "a total of $49 million per institution." The commission's $21.58 million plus $27.5 million comes to $49.08 million, so the $49 million is a round number.
Each school and its lead athletics staff have to attest to their compliance, which means state formally that they follow the rule. The conference says "escalating financial penalties and other disciplinary measures" will follow any violation.
Two things the release leaves out. It doesn't say what counts as arranging. It doesn't say whether the $27.5 million is for a year.
The cap is one $27.5 million limit for the whole school. It counts what the school helps arrange, not what you find yourself.
What it doesn't touch
The Big Ten says it plainly: "This policy applies to institutional action only." Athletes "remain free to pursue NIL opportunities with any entity (associated or non-associated) on their own."
Associated is the commission's word for a business or group known to exist, "in significant part," to promote or support one school's athletics program, or to create deals for its athletes. So a deal you line up yourself, with a shop down the street or with a group tied to your school, sits outside the Big Ten's number.
A deal the school helps set up sits inside it. And the $27.5 million isn't yours alone. It's one figure for every outside deal the school has a hand in, across all its teams.
The review every deal still gets
The new rule doesn't replace the commission's. The Big Ten says its schools "remain subject to all current NCAA rules and College Sports Commission (CSC) policies," including the ones on a valid business purpose and the range of pay.
Those are the two things NIL Go checks. NIL Go is the commission's online system, built with Deloitte. Every Division I athlete reports each outside deal worth $600 or more in total, within 5 business days of signing.
NIL Go asks whether the deal has a valid business purpose, meaning it promotes goods or services sold to the public for profit. It also asks whether the pay is in line with what people of similar value, who aren't athletes at that school, get paid.
If a deal isn't cleared, one option is neutral arbitration, a hearing in front of someone outside both sides. The commission says going ahead with a deal that wasn't cleared or wasn't reported can cost eligibility.
So a deal a Big Ten school helps arrange now meets two limits. It counts toward the school's $27.5 million, and it goes through NIL Go like any other deal of $600 or more. A deal you find yourself meets only the second.
Why $27.5 million
The number comes from a federal bill, the Protect College Sports Act. ESPN reported that the bill would let schools spend $27.5 million more on direct payments to their players. The Senate passed it 77 to 22 on September 28, 2026. The House hasn't voted.
Pamela Whitten, who chairs the Big Ten's council of chancellors and presidents, said that while the bill waits, "it is imperative our member institutions can begin to plan, budget and build their rosters."
Same number, different money. In the bill, the $27.5 million would be paid by the school. In the Big Ten's rule, it's a limit on outside deals the school helps arrange.
Who says it breaks the settlement
Plaintiffs' attorneys in the House settlement said the rule violates that agreement, AP reported. One of them, Steve Berman, put it this way: "Any cap that would keep schools from facilitating deals is a step in the wrong direction."
The Big Ten's release says the House settlement permits the rule. As of November 4, 2026, we found no court ruling on the question.
The 18 schools
The rule covers every Big Ten school: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Maryland, Michigan, Michigan State, Minnesota, Nebraska, Northwestern, Ohio State, Oregon, Penn State, Purdue, Rutgers, UCLA, USC, Washington and Wisconsin.
Each page covers that school's own policy, disclosure and revenue sharing. The state law behind each one is on our college page.
What Leave does with this
Upload a contract and Leave reads it back in plain words. Each deal in Leave comes with your state's rules for your level next to it.
Leave takes 0 percent of anything you sign. You decide what to sign.
Questions people ask
Does the Big Ten's cap limit how much an athlete can earn from deals?
Not from deals the athlete finds on their own. The Big Ten says the rule "applies to institutional action only," and that athletes remain free to pursue deals with any entity, associated with the school or not, on their own. The $27.5 million counts what the school has a hand in arranging.
Is the $27.5 million per athlete?
No. It is per school. The rule caps each member school's involvement in arranging outside deals at $27.5 million. The release does not say whether that figure is for a year or how it is counted.
Is this the Protect College Sports Act?
No. That is a federal bill. The Senate passed it 77 to 22 on September 28, 2026, and the House has not voted. The Big Ten's rule is the conference's own, approved October 28, and it borrows the bill's numbers while the bill waits.
Be your own agent. Leave.